Your perfect portfolio

2025-12-25

In the previous post, I argued that wealth ultimately depends on three variables: how much you contribute, how long you stay invested, and the returns you earn. On paper, chasing higher returns looks like the fastest path to wealth. In practice, higher expected returns usually come with higher risk—and that risk often shows up behaviorally, causing hesitation, second-guessing, or selling at exactly the wrong time. That's why the two levers you truly control—how much you save and invest, and how long you remain invested—matter far more than trying to outsmart the market. In that sense, my definition of a “perfect” portfolio is a simple one: it lets you invest new savings immediately and stay invested through everything. Of course, what makes this possible will look different for each person. In the rest of this post, I'll review two portfolio philosophies and highlight a few practical principles inspired by them. I hope this helps you find your own path toward a “perfect” portfolio.

John Bogle's perfect portfolio [video]

William Sharpe's perfect portfolio [video]

My investing journey started with JL Collins's aggressive VTSAX and chill approach, and was shaped by Ray Dalio's strong opinions during the low interest rate era — “cash is trash,” “don't own bonds,” and “gold should be part of your portfolio.” As my nest egg grew and market environment changed, my perspective shifted. I gradually moved toward William Sharpe's globally diversified WBS strategy, focusing on the efficient frontier and adding bonds and international exposure for a balanced and hopefully more resilient portfolio.

Summary of principles

Further Resources